|phsc voted LII on February 11th @ 05:39:50am|
|phsc voted 5w4 on February 11th @ 05:39:31am|
|phsc voted INFJ (IDR) on February 11th @ 05:39:11am|
|phsc voted INTJ on February 11th @ 05:39:04am|
|Jacobus voted LSI on January 9th @ 04:12:07pm|
|Jacobus voted 1w9 on January 9th @ 04:11:53pm|
|tch voted INFJ (IDR) on January 2nd @ 06:19:43pm|
|Jacobus voted sx/sp on December 28th @ 06:17:15pm|
|Jacobus voted 5w4 on December 28th @ 06:13:14pm|
|Jacobus commented as follows on December 13th @ 09:29:23am:|
MBTI-wise there's nothing Te or Fi (or Ne or Si, for that matter) about him. Look at what he wrote in his journals, in correspondences, etc.
"The World and Life are one. Physiological life is of course not "Life". And neither is psychological life. Life is the world.
The thinkers he admired most were NF types (in both MBTI and Socionics): Kierkegaard, Dostoevsky, Augustine, and so on.
|Jacobus voted IEI on December 8th @ 10:12:32am|
|Jacobus voted INFJ on December 8th @ 10:11:34am|
|tch voted INTJ on November 10th @ 01:07:58pm|
|tch voted INTJ on November 10th @ 01:07:29pm|
|LVNA commented as follows on July 10th @ 12:18:04pm:|
Hmm to me he’s like more or less a Ti sorta response to the very Te cannon that’s Anglo-American philosophy. I don’t really see him as being lost in his imagination/contemplative images or something like that. He could still be INTP by letters though perhaps.
|diobono voted ILI on July 10th @ 08:44:49am|
|diobono commented as follows on July 10th @ 08:21:32am:|
I don't see why lii> Ili. I am not super familiar with his work but it's is less about constructing a system and more about deconstructing things almost like it would be a "car engine " in a way. This seems very creative Te to me.
There is not necessarily a Ti framework of Laws from which a system is created but more of Ni first mental imagery which seems strong to me from what i have read of him. He did rely strongly on mental imagery if i recall and was not overly schematic. He changed his mind too often to be a lii and after the tractatus he sort of steered direction in his work in a way a socionics Ti dominant is not likely to do . For Example Noam Chomsky and Plato who are clear LIIs. Even if their work was shifting in the course of their lives they never really just completely changed direction. Of course this is super hypothethical given i am not too familiar with him.
|fg voted LII on July 10th @ 12:44:33am|
|fg voted INFJ (IDR) on July 10th @ 12:44:24am|
|An anonymous user voted ILI on July 9th @ 12:51:36am|
|Zethmal voted 5w4 on July 7th @ 10:13:53pm|
|Zethmal voted INTJ on July 7th @ 10:13:43pm|
|Diobono commented as follows on June 24th @ 06:58:13am:|
Pure ni-ti that would fit into Idr's Infj like Plato and Spinoza. But would never test as a f at all in any way. (Reminds me of my type that is similar)
|Diobono voted sx/sp on June 24th @ 06:56:16am|
|Diobono voted 5w4 on June 24th @ 06:56:06am|
|Diobono voted INTx on June 24th @ 06:55:57am|
|Diobono voted INFJ (IDR) on June 24th @ 06:55:30am|
|LVNA voted LII on June 24th @ 03:38:55am|
|LVNA voted sp/so on June 24th @ 03:38:45am|
|LVNA voted 5w4 on June 24th @ 03:38:37am|
|LVNA voted INTJ on June 24th @ 03:38:23am|